Claritty vs Make
Make gives you a canvas and every knob on it. Claritty gives you the outcome, with no diagram to own.
How Make works
Make is a visual automation builder. You lay modules out on a scenario canvas and connect them, mapping data field by field, with routers, iterators and aggregators for branching and transformation. The flow is something you design and then maintain as things change.
Make assumes you want to design the flow. Claritty assumes you want the result, and treats the diagram as an output rather than your responsibility.
Where they differ
How it gets built
You describe the task. The automation is generated, and you read it rather than draw it.
You lay out modules on a canvas and connect them, mapping data field by field between each one.
Who maintains it
You change the automation by saying what should be different. It rewrites the steps.
You open the scenario and edit the modules and mappings yourself when something changes.
Steps that need judgment
An agent reads the content and decides, then the run records why it decided that way.
Routers and filters cover rule-shaped decisions. AI modules exist, and you wire and prompt them.
Before it does something real
A dry run shows you what it would have sent. Nothing writes, sends or pays until you approve it.
You add your own guard, a filter step, a manual approval step, or a test run before you switch it on.
Tools with no API
Record the task once in your browser and it repeats it on the site. It keeps what you clicked and never what you typed.
Needs an API, an existing connector, or a webhook. A supplier portal without one is a dead end.
Why Claritty instead
Each of these is something the product does today, not a direction of travel.
There is no canvas to own
The automation is a readable definition rather than a diagram you maintain. Nobody has to hold the shape of a scenario in their head, and nobody inherits one when they join.
A change is a sentence
When the job changes you say what should be different and the steps are rewritten. You are not re-mapping every module downstream of the one you touched.
The judgment call is part of the automation
An agent reads the actual content and decides, so the decision does not have to be expressed as a router condition before the automation can handle it.
Nothing irreversible happens without you
A dry run shows you what it would have sent before it sends it, and a real action waits for your approval. The failure mode of a bad run is a draft you delete rather than an email your customer reads.
It reaches tools that have no API
Record the task once in your browser and Claritty repeats it on the site. The supplier portal and the internal system nobody will build an integration for stop being dead ends. It keeps what you clicked and never what you typed.
Questions people ask
Is Claritty a Make alternative?
Yes, particularly if maintaining the canvas has become the job. Claritty suits people who want the outcome and would rather not own a scenario diagram that has to be updated every time something upstream changes.
I need complex branching. Can Claritty do that?
It handles sequenced steps, conditional paths, and fan-out over a list with a per-run cap. The difference is that you describe the branching you need rather than laying it out module by module, and a branch that depends on reading content is a decision the agent makes.
Can I see what the automation actually does?
Yes. The automation is a readable definition, not a black box, and every run keeps a step-by-step record of what each step received and returned.
Describe the job. Watch it run.
Building an automation is free, and it runs on your real data so you can see whether it actually works before you pay for anything.
Start freeOr read how it works first.